Application of MobileNetV3 and U-Net Architectures in Deep Learning for Brain Tumor Detection

Authors

  • Hisanah Nakhwah Aulia Faruly State Polytechnic of Sriwijaya
  • Lindawati State Polytechnic of Sriwijaya
  • Sarjana Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24235/itej.v11i1.307

Keywords:

Deep Learning, MobileNetV3 Architecture, U-Net Architecture, Brain Tumor Detection, Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Abstract

Brain tumors are neurological conditions that affect essential bodily functioning, necessitating a prompt and precise diagnosis. Brain tumors are frequently detected with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but manual interpretation is laborious and heavily reliant on radiologists' skill. Deep learning has become a popular method for improving medical image analysis. This paper suggests a hybrid deep learning architecture for MRI image-based brain tumor identification that combines MobileNetV3 and U-Net. U-Net was utilized for tumor region segmentation, and MobileNetV3 was utilized for tumor categorization. A publicly available Kaggle Brain Tumor MRI dataset and the BraTS 2021 Dataset were used in the study. The accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, confusion matrix, AUC-ROC, dice coefficient, and intersection over union (IoU) metrics were used to assess the model's performance. The MobileNetV3 model exhibited good precision, recall, and F1-score values along with 95% classification accuracy. Furthermore, outstanding classification performance was demonstrated by the AUC-ROC values, which reached 0.99 and 1.00. The U-Net model received a Dice Coefficient of 0.9404, an IoU score of 0.8940, and a validation accuracy of 0.9936 for segmentation. For precise brain tumor detection and visualization on MRI images, the suggested hybrid architecture successfully integrates classification and segmentation tasks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] S. Sai, R. Sai, and V. Chamola, “Generative AI for Industry 5 . 0 : Analyzing the Impact of ChatGPT , DALLE , and Other Models,” IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc., vol. 6, no. April 2024, pp. 3056–3066, 2025, doi: 10.1109/OJCOMS.2024.3400161.

[2] S. Pereira, A. Pinto, V. Alves, and C. A. Silva, “Brain Tumor Segmentation Using Convolutional Neural Networks in MRI Images,” vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1240–1251, 2016.

[3] M. Munadi, “Penerapan Algoritma Deep Learning untuk Deteksi Dini Penyakit dari Citra Medis,” vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 53–59, 2025.

[4] M. Z. Basri, M. G. Somoal, and R. S. Aji, “Deteksi Tumor Otak pada Citra Magnetic Resonance Imaging ( MRI ) Menggunakan Arsitektur MobileNet dengan Optimizer Adam,” vol. 5, no. 2, 2025.

[5] R. R. Siregar and A. M. Husein, “Klasifikasi Tumor Otak Pada Gambar Magnetic Resonance Images ( MRI ) Dengan Pendekatan Pembelajaran Mendalam,” vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 62–68, 2024.

[6] K. N. Qodri, “Analisis Perbandingan Klasifikasi Tumor Otak Menggunakan Deep Learning,” vol. 1, pp. 1–6, 2024.

[7] G. Chu et al., “Searching for MobileNetV3 Accuracy vs MAdds vs model size,” pp. 1314–1324.

[8] O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer, and T. Brox, “U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation,” pp. 1–8.

[9] A. A. Asiri et al., “Brain Tumor Detection and Classification Using Fine-Tuned CNN with ResNet50 and U-Net Model : A Study on TCGA-LGG and TCIA Dataset for MRI Applications,” 2023.

[10] A. B. Koc and D. Akgun, “A Review of U-Net Based Deep Learning Frameworks for MRI-Based Brain Tumor Segmentation,” pp. 1–36, 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16040506.

[11] S. R. Wahyuni;, Siti, Asrianda, “Classification of Family Hope Program Assistance Recipients Using the C4.5 Algorithm with Z-Score Normalization (Case Study in Atu Lintang District),” ITEJ Inf. Technol. Eng. Journals, vol. 10, pp. 160–173, 2025.

[12] D. H. S. and D. R. K. N. Nitin B. Pawar, “EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF MULTI-MODAL U-NET FOR BRAIN TUMOR SEGMENTATION ON BRATS 2021 MRI DATASET,” vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 1489–1499, 2025.

[13] N. Salari, H. Ghasemi, R. Fatahian, K. Mansouri, and S. Dokaneheifard, “The global prevalence of primary central nervous system tumors : a systematic review and meta ‑ analysis,” Eur. J. Med. Res., pp. 1–16, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01011-y.

[14] M. L. S, M. S. Hibrizi, and N. Latifah, “Klasifikasi Tumor Otak Menggunakan CNN Dengan Arsitektur Resnet50,” vol. 3, pp. 103–108, 2024.

[15] Y. B. Nainggolan, R. S. Perdana, and A. A. Soebroto, “Klasifikasi Penyakit Tumor Otak berdasarkan Citra MRI Menggunakan Metode Convolutional Neural Network EfficientNetV2-S,” vol. 9, no. 10, 2025.

[16] R. A. R, B. W. P, and R. Purbaningtyas, “KLASIFIKASI TUMOR OTAK MENGGUNAKAN CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORK DENGAN ARSITEKTUR EFFICIENTNET-B3,” vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 55–59, 2021.

[17] S. Saeedi, S. Rezayi, H. Keshavarz, and S. R. N. Kalhori, “MRI ‑ based brain tumor detection using convolutional deep learning methods and chosen machine learning techniques,” BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak., vol. 6, pp. 1–17, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02114-6.

[18] Y. Wang, “VIRTUAL BIOPSY FOR INTRACRANIAL TUMORS DIAGNOSIS ON MRI,” 2026.

[19] M. Sandler, M. Zhu, A. Zhmoginov, and C. V Mar, “MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottlenecks”.

[20] N. Khan and A. Das, “Deep learning models for tumor detection and segmentation in medical image analysis : A comprehensive review of ResNet , U-Net , DETR , and inception variants,” vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 195–206, 2024.

[21] C. P. Elkin, “Digital Commons @ Michigan Tech of theory and applications U-Net and Its Variants for Medical Image Segmentation : A Review of Theory and Applications,” pp. 82031–82057, 2021.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-12

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Application of MobileNetV3 and U-Net Architectures in Deep Learning for Brain Tumor Detection. (2026). ITEJ (Information Technology Engineering Journals), 11(1), 132-143. https://doi.org/10.24235/itej.v11i1.307

Similar Articles

41-50 of 55

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.